Mid-market and enterprise (200-50,000 employees) with complex on-call geometry across many teams and services who need the broadest integration ecosystem and battle-tested reliability.
High-velocity software shops who want Slack-native AI-first workflow (incident.io wins), small teams (Spike.sh or Better Stack 70-80% cheaper), or buyers prioritizing modern UX over breadth.
Is PagerDuty a trustworthy vendor?
- 2019-04-11IPO on NYSE; public company financial transparency
- 2020-10-06Acquired Rundeck for $100M; runbook automation depth added
- 2024-03-22Renewal pricing increases of 15-20% reported widely by enterprise customers
- 2024-09-18Customer churn to incident.io accelerating; Q3 net retention pressure noted on earnings call
- 2025-04-15PagerDuty AI Operations (Bits AI) launched as natural-language incident assistant
- 2025-11-12Restructuring announced; sales reorganization to defend mid-market
What 1,240 reviews actually say
Synthesized from G2, Capterra, Reddit, Trustpilot. Patterns >15% prevalence shown.
Praise patterns
- Industry-leading alert routing and on-call depth87% →
- Broadest integration ecosystem in category78% →
- Battle-tested mobile reliability for paging71% →
- Runbook automation valuable for response orchestration51% →
Complaint patterns
- Pricing escalated meaningfully on renewals78% ↑
- Per-user pricing compounds painfully at scale64% ↑
- AI velocity feels behind incident.io47% ↑
- UI feels older than modern competitors41% ↑
- ChatOps workflows feel bolted-on38% →
-
“PagerDuty still wakes us up reliably and that's the job, but at $41/user/month with 18% renewal increases, we're piloting incident.io for the next contract.”
SRE Lead, Series C SaaS· G2 · 2026-03-18
-
“The integration breadth is unmatched. We have 47 monitoring tools feeding alerts and PagerDuty is the only platform that connects to all of them without custom work.”
Director of Platform Engineering· G2 · 2026-02-08
What buyers actually pay
187 anonymized deal disclosures · last updated 2026-04-30
| Company size | Median annual |
|---|---|
| 25-100 users | $28,800 |
| 100-500 users | $168,000 |
| 500+ users | $540,000 |
Auto-verified certifications
Editorial: Strengths
- Industry-leading alert routing and on-call depth
- 700+ integrations (broadest in category)
- Public company financial transparency
- Battle-tested at extreme scale (Stripe, Slack, Salesforce historically)
- AIOps event correlation reduces alert noise
- Runbook automation via Rundeck for response orchestration
- Strong mobile apps with iOS/Android push reliability
Editorial: Weaknesses
- Pricing escalated 15-20% on renewals through 2024
- Per-user pricing compounds painfully at scale (200+ engineers)
- Customer churn to incident.io accelerating since 2024
- AI feature velocity perceived as trailing incident.io
- UI feels older than incident.io or Rootly
- ChatOps-first workflows feel bolted-on vs native
Key features & integrations
- +Alert routing and escalation policies
- +On-call scheduling with overrides
- +Incident response automation
- +AIOps event correlation
- +Runbook automation (Rundeck)
- +Status pages
- +Postmortem templates
- +Mobile apps (iOS/Android)
- +700+ integrations
Read our full ranking of Incident Management & On-Call Software
PagerDuty ranks #1 in our editorial review of 10 incident management & on-call software platforms. The deep-dive covers methodology, comparison tables, decision matrix, migration scoring, and FAQs.
Read the full rankingClosest alternatives in Incident Management & On-Call Software
Contribute your verified deal price
Pricing in B2B software is opaque because vendors want it that way. Verified buyer prices fix that, anonymously. Share what you actually paid for PagerDuty; we’ll add it to the verified pricing dataset on this page (with company size band only, no identifying details).
Submit anonymously