Skip to content
Z Zendikt
O
Compensation Management · Rank #10 of 10

OpenComp

RSU/equity-anchored modern total rewards.

By OpenComp, Inc. · Founded 2020 · San Francisco, CA · private

OpenComp is the modern total rewards platform anchored on RSU and equity visualization, founded 2020 in San Francisco. Last raised $47M Series B (2022). The product covers compensation benchmarking + total rewards visualization + RSU/equity statements + offer-letter integration, anchored on the strongest equity compensation visualization in category and a strong fit for venture-backed tech firms with significant equity comp. Strengths: best-in-category equity compensation visualization (RSU vesting schedules, options grant tracking, equity refresh cycles), strong fit for venture-backed tech firms, founder-led culture, modern UX, and clean cap-table integration (Carta, Pulley, Shareworks). Trade-offs: Smaller deployed base versus Pave (less benchmarking data depth in OpenComp benchmarks than Pave benchmarks), planning workflow less mature than Pave/Beqom, brand recognition lower than category leaders, and 2022 Series B was the last reported funding round (some signal of growth slowdown).

Visit OpenComp Vendor pricing Compare to Comparably
Best for

Venture-backed tech companies (100-1,500 employees) with significant equity compensation (RSU grants, options refresh cycles) wanting equity visualization integrated with compensation benchmarking.

Worst for

Non-equity-heavy orgs (Pave/Figures better fit), enterprise sales-comp-heavy (Beqom better), or European-HQ firms (Figures better).

Vendor Trust Score

Is OpenComp a trustworthy vendor?

7.4/10
Mixed
Pricing transparency
Published rates; no hidden fees
6.0
Contract fairness
Reasonable terms; no auto-renew traps
8.0
Incident response
How they handle outages and breaches
7.5
Post-acquisition behavior
Customer treatment after M&A or PE
8.0
Executive stability
Leadership churn over 24 months
7.5
Roadmap honesty
Public commitments held
7.5
Trust signal log
  • 2022-04-22
    Series B raised $47M for modern total rewards platform
  • 2024-09-22
    No new funding reported since 2022 Series B; growth slowdown signal
  • 2025-04-22
    Equity visualization features expanded with Carta and Pulley deeper integration
Vendor Trust is scored independently of product quality. A great product from an unfair vendor still earns a low trust score.
Review Intelligence

What 140 reviews actually say

Synthesized from G2, Capterra, Reddit, Trustpilot. Patterns >15% prevalence shown.

Last synthesized
2026-04-29

Praise patterns

  • Best-in-category equity compensation visualization
    87% →
  • Made for venture-backed tech firms
    78% →
  • Clean cap-table integration
    64% →
  • Modern UX
    51% →

Complaint patterns

  • Lighter market share than Pave
    47% →
  • OpenComp benchmarks less deep than Pave
    41% →
  • Planning workflow less mature than Pave/Beqom
    38% →
  • Growth slowdown signal post-2022 Series B
    31% ↑
Sentiment trend (6 months)
81/100 +1 pts
12
01
02
03
04
05
Representative voices

  • “OpenComp is the only platform where our employees can actually understand their RSU vesting cliff. Pave gets the benchmark right but misses the equity story.”

    CFO, Series C SaaS· G2 · 2026-03-29

Patterns are extracted from review corpus and human-verified. We surface trends, not anecdotes.
Verified Pricing

What buyers actually pay

87 anonymized deal disclosures · last updated 2026-05-01

Contribute your deal price
Company size Median annual
50-200 employees $14,400
200-1,000 employees $72,000
1,000-1,500 employees $156,000
Verified pricing is crowdsourced from buyers under anonymity guarantees. Vendor-listed prices are validated against actual deals quarterly.
Compliance & Security

Auto-verified certifications

Verified 2026-05-01
SOC 2 Type II
ISO 27001
HIPAA
GDPR
CCPA
PCI DSS
FedRAMP

Editorial: Strengths

  • Best-in-category equity compensation visualization
  • Built for venture-backed tech firms
  • Founder-led culture
  • Modern UX
  • Clean cap-table integration (Carta, Pulley, Shareworks)
  • RSU vesting and options grant tracking depth

Editorial: Weaknesses

  • Thinner footprint than Pave
  • OpenComp benchmarks less deep than Pave benchmarks
  • Planning workflow less mature than Pave/Beqom
  • Brand recognition lower than category leaders
  • 2022 Series B was last reported funding (growth slowdown signal)
  • Support response times vary

Key features & integrations

  • +Equity compensation visualization (RSU + options)
  • +Compensation benchmarking
  • +Total rewards portal
  • +Offer-letter automation
  • +Cap-table integration (Carta, Pulley, Shareworks)
  • +HRIS integration
  • +Pay band design
  • +50+ integrations
50+ integrations
CartaPulleyShareworksWorkday HCMRipplingGreenhouseAshby
Geography supported
Primarily US, some EU
Best fit
100–1,500 employees · Venture-backed tech firms with equity comp
Editorial deep-dive

Read our full ranking of Compensation Management

OpenComp ranks #10 in our editorial review of 10 compensation management platforms. The deep-dive covers methodology, comparison tables, decision matrix, migration scoring, and FAQs.

Read the full ranking

Closest alternatives in Compensation Management

#9
Comparably
Compensation transparency + employer brand platform.
★ 4.2 opaque
#8
Mercer Compensation Surveys
Enterprise compensation incumbent, Mercer surveys + ePrism.
★ 4.0 opaque
#7
Salary.com
Long-running compensation benchmarking incumbent.
★ 4.2 opaque
Help the next buyer

Contribute your verified deal price

Pricing in B2B software is opaque because vendors want it that way. Verified buyer prices fix that, anonymously. Share what you actually paid for OpenComp; we’ll add it to the verified pricing dataset on this page (with company size band only, no identifying details).

Submit anonymously