Skip to content
Z Zendikt
L

Lever

Modern ATS UX, stagnated post-Employ acquisition.

By Employ Inc. · Founded 2012 · Toronto, Canada · private

Lever was the modern ATS challenger to Greenhouse from 2012-2022. Acquired by Employ Inc. (parent of Jobvite, JazzHR) in 2022. Post-acquisition product velocity has slowed and customer reports indicate stagnation. The product's strengths: still-modern UX, native CRM (Lever Nurture), and lower price point than Greenhouse. Trade-offs: post-Employ stagnation flagged consistently, customer support quality has declined, and many former Lever customers are migrating to Ashby or Greenhouse.

Best for

Mid-sized tech companies (100-500 employees) wanting modern ATS at lower cost than Greenhouse, willing to accept slower product velocity.

Worst for

Fast-growing companies prioritizing innovation (Ashby better), enterprise (Greenhouse/iCIMS better), or staffing agencies (Bullhorn better).

Vendor Trust Score

Is Lever a trustworthy vendor?

6.4/10
Mixed
Pricing transparency
Published rates; no hidden fees
5.5
Contract fairness
Reasonable terms; no auto-renew traps
7.0
Incident response
How they handle outages and breaches
7.0
Post-acquisition behavior
Customer treatment after M&A or PE
6.0
Executive stability
Leadership churn over 24 months
6.5
Roadmap honesty
Public commitments held
6.5
Trust signal log
  • 2022-04-12
    Acquired by Employ Inc. (parent of Jobvite, JazzHR)
  • 2024-08-15
    Product velocity has slowed; user reports of stalled feature requests
  • 2025-03-22
    Customer churn to Ashby and Greenhouse reported in industry forums
Vendor Trust is scored independently of product quality. A great product from an unfair vendor still earns a low trust score.
Review Intelligence

What 1,640 reviews actually say

Synthesized from G2, Capterra, Reddit, Trustpilot. Patterns >15% prevalence shown.

Last synthesized
2026-04-29

Praise patterns

  • Modern ATS UX still credible
    71%
  • Native CRM (Lever Nurture)
    64%
  • Lower price than Greenhouse
    58%

Complaint patterns

  • Post-Employ stagnation
    64%
  • Product velocity has slowed
    58%
  • Customer support quality declined
    51%
Sentiment trend (6 months)
69/100 -2 pts
11
12
01
02
03
04
Patterns are extracted from review corpus and human-verified. We surface trends, not anecdotes.
Verified Pricing

What buyers actually pay

187 anonymized deal disclosures · last updated 2026-04-30

Contribute your deal price
Company size Median annual
50-200 employees $8,400
200-1,000 employees $18,000
Verified pricing is crowdsourced from buyers under anonymity guarantees. Vendor-listed prices are validated against actual deals quarterly.
Compliance & Security

Auto-verified certifications

Verified 2026-04-15
SOC 2 Type II
ISO 27001
HIPAA
GDPR
CCPA
PCI DSS
FedRAMP

Editorial: Strengths

  • Modern ATS UX (still credible)
  • Native CRM (Lever Nurture)
  • Lower price point than Greenhouse ($5K-$25K)
  • Best for 100-500 employee tech companies
  • Established brand with 1,500+ customers

Editorial: Weaknesses

  • Post-Employ acquisition stagnation
  • Product velocity has slowed
  • Customer support quality declined
  • Migration churn to Ashby/Greenhouse
  • Innovation lagging vs Ashby

Key features & integrations

  • +ATS + CRM combo (Lever Nurture)
  • +Structured interview kits
  • +Custom dashboards
  • +Career site CMS
  • +Source tracking
  • +EEO/OFCCP reporting
  • +300+ integrations
300+ integrations
LinkedIn RecruiterIndeedSlackBambooHRWorkday HCMCalendly
Geography supported
Global; strongest in US, EU, UK, Canada
Best fit
50–2,000 employees · Mid-sized tech companies
Editorial deep-dive

Read our full ranking of Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS)

Lever ranks #3 in our editorial review of 10 applicant tracking systems (ats) platforms. The deep-dive covers methodology, comparison tables, decision matrix, migration scoring, and FAQs.

Read the full ranking

Closest alternatives in Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS)

Help the next buyer

Contribute your verified deal price

Pricing in B2B software is opaque because vendors want it that way. Verified buyer prices fix that, anonymously. Share what you actually paid for Lever; we’ll add it to the verified pricing dataset on this page (with company size band only, no identifying details).

Submit anonymously