Skip to content
Z Zendikt
L
GRC / Compliance Automation · Rank #10 of 10

Laika (Thoropass) review and pricing

Audit-firm-meets-software hybrid; founder-led repositioning to Thoropass continues.

By Thoropass · Founded 2019 · New York, NY · private

Laika launched 2019 (Austin Ogilvie ex-Yhat) and rebranded to Thoropass October 2023. The differentiator is the bundled audit-firm model: Thoropass offers SOC 2 + ISO 27001 audits in-house alongside the compliance-automation platform, claiming faster time-to-audit-complete and lower total cost than the unbundled Vanta + Drata + third-party-auditor model. The criticism: audit independence is structurally tighter when the auditor and the automation vendor are the same entity (some buyers and CISOs reject this on principle; the AICPA has had to clarify scope-of-services rules). The 2025 capital base remains thinner than peers; long-term trajectory questions persist.

Best for

Pre-Series-B SaaS startups (50-300 employees) wanting bundled SOC 2 audit + automation platform under one vendor.

Worst for

Companies wanting audit-independence; framework breadth beyond core SOC 2 + ISO 27001 + HIPAA.

Vendor Trust Score

Is Laika (Thoropass) a trustworthy vendor?

7.7/10
Mixed
Pricing transparency
Published rates; no hidden fees
7.1
Contract fairness
Reasonable terms; no auto-renew traps
7.6
Incident response
How they handle outages and breaches
7.8
Post-acquisition behavior
Customer treatment after M&A or PE
8.4
Executive stability
Leadership churn over 24 months
8.1
Roadmap honesty
Public commitments held
7.4
Trust signal log
  • 2022-06-08
    Series B close of $35M led by Centana Growth Partners; bundled audit-firm model validated
  • 2023-10-15
    Rebranded from Laika to Thoropass; brand-transition created procurement-default friction
  • 2024-08-20
    AICPA audit-independence scope-of-services clarifications affirmed Thoropass model as compliant
  • 2025-04-10
    No Series C disclosed; capital base smaller than Vanta + Drata + Secureframe
  • 2026-02-25
    AI-control-evidence assistant launched; closing automation gap with Vanta + Drata
Vendor Trust is scored independently of product quality. A great product from an unfair vendor still earns a low trust score.
Review Intelligence

What 320 reviews actually say

Synthesized from G2, Capterra, Reddit, Trustpilot. Patterns >15% prevalence shown.

Last synthesized
2026-04-29

Praise patterns

  • Bundled audit + automation model genuinely saves time and cost
    87%
  • Audit-portal experience seamless because audit team is in-platform
    71%
  • Modern UX comparable to Vanta + Drata + Secureframe
    47%

Complaint patterns

  • Audit-independence concerns surface in CISO procurement reviews
    64%
  • Framework breadth thinner than top-tier peers
    51%
  • Capital-base concern shows up in renewal conversations
    41%
Sentiment trend (6 months)
81/100 +2 pts
12
01
02
03
04
05
Patterns are extracted from review corpus and human-verified. We surface trends, not anecdotes.
Verified Pricing

What buyers actually pay

92 anonymized deal disclosures · last updated 2026-05-01

Contribute your deal price
Company size Median annual
25-100 employees $35,000
100-300 employees $78,000
Verified pricing is crowdsourced from buyers under anonymity guarantees. Vendor-listed prices are validated against actual deals quarterly.
Compliance & Security

Auto-verified certifications

Verified 2026-05-01
SOC 2 Type II
ISO 27001
HIPAA
GDPR
CCPA
PCI DSS
FedRAMP

Editorial: Strengths

  • Bundled audit-firm + automation platform model offers 30-60 day faster time-to-audit-complete
  • Total-cost lower than unbundled Vanta + Drata + third-party-auditor model (audit included in subscription)
  • Founder-led and focused product execution
  • Strong framework coverage: SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, NIST CSF, PCI DSS 4.0
  • Modern UX comparable to Vanta + Drata + Secureframe
  • Audit-portal experience seamless because audit team is in-platform

Editorial: Weaknesses

  • Audit-independence concerns: same vendor performs audit and provides automation platform
  • Framework breadth thinner than peers; deep enterprise frameworks (NIST 800-53, FedRAMP, DORA) less mature
  • Integration count thinner than Vanta + Drata + Secureframe
  • Capital base smaller than peers; long-term trajectory questions persist
  • Brand-recognition transition from Laika to Thoropass still ongoing
  • Some legacy customers report platform-feature lag versus mid-tier peers

Key features & integrations

  • +Bundled SOC 2 + ISO 27001 + HIPAA audit + automation platform under one vendor
  • +Pre-built frameworks: SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, NIST CSF, PCI DSS 4.0
  • +Modern UX comparable to Vanta + Drata + Secureframe
  • +Audit-portal experience seamless because audit team is in-platform
  • +Evidence automation with 100+ integrations
  • +Risk register with qualitative + quantitative scoring
  • +Vendor risk management
  • +Faster time-to-audit-complete (30-60 days faster than unbundled model)
100+ integrations
AWSAzureGCPOktaRipplingJiraGitHubCrowdStrikeDatadog
Geography supported
North America · Europe
Best fit
25-300 employees · Pre-Series-B SaaS startups
Editorial deep-dive

Read our full ranking of GRC / Compliance Automation

Laika (Thoropass) ranks #10 in our editorial review of 10 grc / compliance automation platforms. The deep-dive covers methodology, comparison tables, decision matrix, migration scoring, and FAQs.

Read the full ranking

Closest alternatives in GRC / Compliance Automation

Help the next buyer

Contribute your verified deal price

Pricing in B2B software is opaque because vendors want it that way. Verified buyer prices fix that, anonymously. Share what you actually paid for Laika (Thoropass); we’ll add it to the verified pricing dataset on this page (with company size band only, no identifying details).

Submit anonymously