Organizations consolidating into Dialpad UC (50-2,000 employees), calls, meetings, messaging, contact center as one AI-anchored platform.
Standalone meetings buyers (Zoom or Google Meet better), Microsoft 365 enterprises (Teams bundle wins), buyers needing FedRAMP authorization (Zoom, Teams, Webex better), or large-meeting / webinar use cases.
Is Dialpad Meetings a trustworthy vendor?
- 2018-10-15Dialpad Ai launches; positions as AI-first UC platform years before Zoom AI Companion
- 2021-12-15Series F raised $170M at $2.2B valuationValidates AI-first UC positioning during late-2021 SaaS market peak.
- 2023-04-22Dialpad launches Ai Coach and Ai Recap across UC suite
- 2024-09-22Dialpad Ai expansion across Meetings, Talk, Contact Center, Sell
- 2025-09-22AI Voice Intelligence capabilities continue to lead category for real-time transcription and summarization
What 1,480 reviews actually say
Synthesized from G2, Capterra, Reddit, Trustpilot. Patterns >15% prevalence shown.
Praise patterns
- Best-in-class AI engine across meetings + calls78% ↑
- Real-time AI transcription and summarization71% ↑
- Strong fit as part of Dialpad UC consolidation64% →
- Modern UX51% →
- Transparent SMB pricing41% →
Complaint patterns
- Standalone meetings value weaker than UC bundle47% →
- 150-participant cap below Zoom and Teams41% →
- Integration ecosystem narrower than Zoom or Teams38% →
- No FedRAMP authorization31% →
-
“Dialpad as a standalone meetings tool is fine, it is not as good as Zoom for raw meetings. But Dialpad as a UC platform (calls + meetings + messaging + contact center, all with the same AI engine running across them) is genuinely differentiated. We replaced RingCentral with Dialpad UC and have not looked back.”
IT Director, mid-market services· g2 · 2026-03-22
-
“Dialpad Ai for real-time transcription on sales calls is transformative. Our reps get coaching summaries within seconds of the call ending. The meetings product alone would not be the reason we picked Dialpad, the UC bundle and the AI engine are.”
VP Revenue Operations· g2 · 2026-04-08
What buyers actually pay
187 anonymized deal disclosures · last updated 2026-05-01
| Company size | Median annual |
|---|---|
| 10-50 employees | $1,800 |
| 50-500 employees | $14,400 |
| 500+ employees | $96,000 |
Auto-verified certifications
Editorial: Strengths
- Best-in-class AI engine across meetings + calls + contact center
- Real-time AI transcription and summarization
- Strong fit as part of Dialpad UC consolidation
- Modern UX
- Founder-led culture and AI-first positioning
- Transparent SMB pricing
- HIPAA via BAA at standard tiers
Editorial: Weaknesses
- Standalone meetings value proposition weaker than the UC bundle
- 150-participant cap below Zoom and Teams large-meeting tiers
- Integration ecosystem narrower than Zoom or Teams
- Outside Dialpad UC ecosystem rarely the right choice
- Narrower customer base than category leaders
- No FedRAMP authorization
Key features & integrations
- +Real-time AI transcription and summarization
- +AI-driven coaching and sentiment analysis
- +Meetings up to 150 participants
- +Native integration with Dialpad Talk (UCaaS)
- +CRM integration (Salesforce, HubSpot, Zendesk)
- +HIPAA via BAA at standard tiers
- +Modern macOS and Windows desktop apps
- +Mobile apps for iOS and Android
Read our full ranking of Video Conferencing
Dialpad Meetings ranks #8 in our editorial review of 10 video conferencing platforms. The deep-dive covers methodology, comparison tables, decision matrix, migration scoring, and FAQs.
Read the full rankingClosest alternatives in Video Conferencing
Contribute your verified deal price
Pricing in B2B software is opaque because vendors want it that way. Verified buyer prices fix that, anonymously. Share what you actually paid for Dialpad Meetings; we’ll add it to the verified pricing dataset on this page (with company size band only, no identifying details).
Submit anonymously