Cloud-native SaaS companies and security-conscious mid-market organizations (100-2,500 employees) needing continuous external web-app and surface monitoring enriched by researcher-contributed signatures, particularly EU-headquartered or EU-operating companies.
Buyers wanting true scheduled human-led pen tests (Cobalt / HackerOne PTaaS / Synack better), Fortune 500 wanting the largest researcher pool (HackerOne / Bugcrowd better), US federal buyers (Synack better federal pedigree), or buyers needing broad PTaaS product breadth (Bugcrowd / HackerOne broader).
Is Detectify a trustworthy vendor?
- 2022-09-22Series B raised $10M; EU growth capital secured
- 2024-04-22Crowdsource program crossed milestone in researcher-contributed vulnerability modules; signature library expanded
- 2025-03-22Surface Monitoring product expanded with NIS2-mapped reporting; EU compliance positioning strengthened
What 110 reviews actually say
Synthesized from G2, Capterra, Reddit, Trustpilot. Patterns >15% prevalence shown.
Praise patterns
- Crowdsource researcher-contributed signatures differentiated87% →
- Continuous external monitoring valuable for SaaS78% →
- Developer-friendly UX adopted by engineering71% →
- EU data residency (Stockholm) valued51% ↑
Complaint patterns
- More DAST + EASM than true PTaaS47% →
- Product breadth narrower than HackerOne / Bugcrowd41% →
- Per-domain / per-application pricing escalates38% ↑
- US Fortune 500 brand recognition thinner31% →
What buyers actually pay
72 anonymized deal disclosures · last updated 2026-05-01
| Company size | Median annual |
|---|---|
| Surface Monitoring (mid-market) | $12,000 |
| Application Scanning (mid-market) | $36,000 |
| Enterprise bundle | $96,000 |
Auto-verified certifications
Editorial: Strengths
- Crowdsource program pays researchers for novel vulnerability modules
- Strong continuous external monitoring (Surface Monitoring, Application Scanning)
- EU data residency (Stockholm-based platform infrastructure)
- Developer-friendly UX engineering teams adopt
- Mature for cloud-native SaaS and mid-market
- GDPR-native handling
- Fast deployment and time-to-value
Editorial: Weaknesses
- Meaningfully more DAST + EASM than true PTaaS (no human-led pen tests)
- Product breadth narrower than HackerOne / Bugcrowd / Cobalt
- Researcher pool meaningfully smaller
- Brand recognition in US Fortune 500 thinner
- Edge-of-category positioning requires clear-eyed buying
Key features & integrations
- +Surface Monitoring (external attack surface)
- +Application Scanning (deep web-app scanning)
- +Crowdsource program (researcher-contributed vulnerability modules)
- +Continuous scanning (not scheduled point-in-time)
- +EU data residency (Stockholm)
- +GDPR-native handling
- +Mature integrations (Jira, Slack, GitHub)
- +Developer-friendly UX
Read our full ranking of Penetration Testing as a Service (PTaaS)
Detectify ranks #10 in our editorial review of 10 penetration testing as a service (ptaas) platforms. The deep-dive covers methodology, comparison tables, decision matrix, migration scoring, and FAQs.
Read the full rankingClosest alternatives in Penetration Testing as a Service (PTaaS)
Contribute your verified deal price
Pricing in B2B software is opaque because vendors want it that way. Verified buyer prices fix that, anonymously. Share what you actually paid for Detectify; we’ll add it to the verified pricing dataset on this page (with company size band only, no identifying details).
Submit anonymously