Skip to content
Z Zendikt
C
Secrets Management Software · Rank #8 of 10

CyberArk Conjur review and pricing

CyberArk-anchored secrets management inside the Identity Security Platform.

By CyberArk Software Ltd. · Founded 2011 · Petach Tikva, Israel · public

Conjur was acquired by CyberArk in 2017 and is now the secrets-management arm of the CyberArk Identity Security Platform. Two product lines exist: Conjur Open Source (community-maintained) and Conjur Enterprise (commercial, deeply integrated with CyberArk PAM). The buying decision is usually downstream of a CyberArk PAM decision; standalone Conjur evaluations are rare because Vault, Doppler, and Akeyless win on feature depth or developer ergonomics. Best fit only when CyberArk PAM is already deployed and the buyer wants one vendor relationship for human and machine credentials.

Visit CyberArk Conjur Compare to Infisical
Best for

CyberArk-anchored regulated enterprises (1,000-50,000+ employees) consolidating secrets management with PAM under the CyberArk Identity Security Platform.

Worst for

Standalone secrets buyers (Vault, Doppler, Akeyless win), or developer-led teams expecting modern ergonomics.

Vendor Trust Score

Is CyberArk Conjur a trustworthy vendor?

6.8/10
Mixed
Pricing transparency
Published rates; no hidden fees
4.5
Contract fairness
Reasonable terms; no auto-renew traps
6.0
Incident response
How they handle outages and breaches
8.5
Post-acquisition behavior
Customer treatment after M&A or PE
7.0
Executive stability
Leadership churn over 24 months
8.0
Roadmap honesty
Public commitments held
7.0
Trust signal log
  • 2017-05-04
    CyberArk acquired Conjur for $42M
    Brought secrets-management capability into the CyberArk platform.
  • 2023-09-12
    Conjur folded fully into Identity Security Platform
    Branding and packaging unified; standalone Conjur sales motion deprecated for new logos.
  • 2024-10-01
    CyberArk Venafi acquisition closed for $1.54B
    Machine identity and certificate lifecycle added; Conjur positioning within machine-identity stack still being clarified.
Vendor Trust is scored independently of product quality. A great product from an unfair vendor still earns a low trust score.
Review Intelligence

What 180 reviews actually say

Synthesized from G2, Capterra, Reddit, Trustpilot. Patterns >15% prevalence shown.

Last synthesized
2026-04-29

Praise patterns

  • Deepest integration with CyberArk PAM and Identity Security Platform
    78% →
  • Policy-as-code model is strong
    51% →
  • Conjur Open Source useful for evaluation
    41% ↓

Complaint patterns

  • Best value only when CyberArk PAM is already in place
    64% →
  • Developer ergonomics weaker than modern peers
    47% →
  • Pricing opaque inside the CyberArk umbrella contract
    41% →
  • Conjur Open Source velocity has slowed
    31% ↑
Sentiment trend (6 months)
73/100 +2 pts
12
01
02
03
04
05
Patterns are extracted from review corpus and human-verified. We surface trends, not anecdotes.
Verified Pricing

What buyers actually pay

38 anonymized deal disclosures · last updated 2026-05-01

Contribute your deal price
Company size Median annual
1,000-5,000 employees $108,000
5,000-20,000 employees $320,000
20,000+ employees $780,000
Verified pricing is crowdsourced from buyers under anonymity guarantees. Vendor-listed prices are validated against actual deals quarterly.
Compliance & Security

Auto-verified certifications

Verified 2026-05-01
SOC 2 Type II
ISO 27001
HIPAA
GDPR
CCPA
PCI DSS
FedRAMP Authorized

Editorial: Strengths

  • Deepest integration with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Identity Security Platform
  • Conjur Open Source provides a free entry point for evaluation
  • Strong policy-as-code model (YAML-based)
  • Mature Kubernetes integration via Secretless Broker and authenticators
  • Auditor-grade evidence trails inherited from CyberArk platform
  • CyberArk public-company financial transparency

Editorial: Weaknesses

  • Best value only when CyberArk PAM is already in place; rarely a standalone buying motion
  • Developer ergonomics weaker than Doppler, Infisical, or Bitwarden
  • Pricing opaque; bundled inside CyberArk Identity Security Platform pricing
  • Conjur Open Source velocity has slowed relative to community expectations
  • Smaller standalone community than Vault
  • Annual price escalators of 7-12% at renewal reported on the CyberArk umbrella contract

Key features & integrations

  • +Centralized policy-as-code (YAML) for secrets and access
  • +Secretless Broker for application secret-less workflows
  • +Kubernetes authenticator for native pod identity
  • +Strong integration with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager
  • +JWT and OIDC authenticators for cloud-native workloads
  • +Audit logs feed into CyberArk PAM evidence trails
  • +Role-based access control with policy inheritance
  • +CLI and SDK coverage
  • +On-prem and SaaS (CyberArk Privilege Cloud) deployment options
200+ integrations
CyberArk PAMKubernetesAWSAzureGCPServiceNowSplunkMicrosoft SentinelOktaMicrosoft Entra ID
Geography supported
Global; strongest in US, EU, Israel, APAC
Best fit
1,000-100,000+ employees · CyberArk-anchored regulated enterprises
Editorial deep-dive

Read our full ranking of Secrets Management Software

CyberArk Conjur ranks #8 in our editorial review of 10 secrets management software platforms. The deep-dive covers methodology, comparison tables, decision matrix, migration scoring, and FAQs.

Read the full ranking

Closest alternatives in Secrets Management Software

#7
Infisical
Open-source modern secrets platform with rapid developer adoption.
★ 4.8 partial
#9
Delinea Secret Server (DevOps Secrets Vault)
Legacy Secret Server plus DevOps Secrets Vault on the Delinea Platform.
★ 4.5 opaque
#6
Bitwarden Secrets Manager
Open-source heritage extended into machine secrets management.
★ 4.6 public
Help the next buyer

Contribute your verified deal price

Pricing in B2B software is opaque because vendors want it that way. Verified buyer prices fix that, anonymously. Share what you actually paid for CyberArk Conjur; we’ll add it to the verified pricing dataset on this page (with company size band only, no identifying details).

Submit anonymously