Distributed remote-first design and engineering teams (10-200 employees) on macOS prioritizing modern UX and audio quality, who can absorb vendor-stability risk on contracts under 12 months.
Enterprises requiring FedRAMP / HIPAA (Zoom, Teams, Webex better), Microsoft 365 organizations (Teams bundle wins), Windows-first shops, or any buyer wanting vendor-stability assurance over modern UX.
Is Around a trustworthy vendor?
- 2020-06-15Around launches publicly with floating-tile meeting UX
- 2021-03-22Series A raised $5.2M led by Floodgate; Slack Fund and Maven Ventures participateStrong investor base validates modern-meetings positioning.
- 2024-11-15Reports of wind-down operations and layoffs surfaceMultiple late-2024 sources reported Around was winding down. Product remained operational but vendor stability became a legitimate buyer concern. As of May 2026 product still operational, but buyers should do explicit diligence before multi-year contracts.
- 2025-02-15Around continues operating with reduced teamProduct still live and supported but at reduced engineering velocity; uncertainty about long-term roadmap remains.
What 280 reviews actually say
Synthesized from G2, Capterra, Reddit, Trustpilot. Patterns >15% prevalence shown.
Praise patterns
- Best-in-category modern UX (floating tiles)87% →
- Best-in-class AI audio noise suppression78% →
- Lightweight always-on call UX64% →
- Built for distributed remote-first teams51% →
Complaint patterns
- Vendor stability uncertainty after late-2024 wind-down rumors64% ↑
- Smaller installed base and narrow integration ecosystem47% →
- macOS-first means weaker Windows experience41% →
- No FedRAMP / HIPAA enterprise compliance38% →
- Roadmap velocity slowed since late 202431% ↑
-
“Around is the best meeting UX in any video tool I have used. The floating tiles, the noise suppression, the always-on call mode, it is genuinely better for our distributed engineering team than Zoom or Meet. The honest concern is the late-2024 wind-down rumors. We are on month-to-month and watching closely.”
Engineering Manager, remote-first SaaS· g2 · 2026-03-22
-
“Beautiful product. Audio is unbelievable. But our procurement team flagged the vendor-stability rumors at renewal and we ended up moving back to Google Meet for the broader Workspace integration and stability assurance.”
Head of Operations· g2 · 2026-04-08
What buyers actually pay
87 anonymized deal disclosures · last updated 2026-05-01
| Company size | Median annual |
|---|---|
| 5-50 employees | $720 |
| 50-500 employees | $5,400 |
Auto-verified certifications
Editorial: Strengths
- Best-in-category modern meeting UX (floating tiles)
- Best-in-class AI-driven audio noise suppression
- Works for distributed remote-first teams
- Lightweight always-on call UX
- Founder-led culture and design quality
- Modern macOS-first product engineering
- Strong React-based architecture
Editorial: Weaknesses
- Vendor stability uncertainty after late-2024 wind-down rumors, buyer diligence required
- Less penetration than Zoom, Teams, Google Meet
- Narrow integration ecosystem (50 integrations versus 500+ for leaders)
- No FedRAMP, HIPAA, or enterprise compliance posture
- macOS-first means weaker Windows experience
- Mobile experience less polished than desktop
- Limited UCaaS / phone story
Key features & integrations
- +Floating-tile meeting UX
- +Best-in-class AI audio noise suppression
- +Lightweight always-on call mode
- +Slack and Notion integration
- +Cloud recording
- +Whiteboard and screen share
- +Modern macOS-first design
- +Custom backgrounds and effects
Read our full ranking of Video Conferencing
Around ranks #6 in our editorial review of 10 video conferencing platforms. The deep-dive covers methodology, comparison tables, decision matrix, migration scoring, and FAQs.
Read the full rankingClosest alternatives in Video Conferencing
Contribute your verified deal price
Pricing in B2B software is opaque because vendors want it that way. Verified buyer prices fix that, anonymously. Share what you actually paid for Around; we’ll add it to the verified pricing dataset on this page (with company size band only, no identifying details).
Submit anonymously